Analytics
Performance insights across the fleet · last 6 months · 12 garages
ECD adherence (30d)
0%
Work orders meeting effective ECD
Closed jobs (30d)
0
Volume passing through the system
Escalations (30d)
0
Rules engine triggers
Communications (30d)
0
Emails + SMS + calls
ECD adherence trend
Week-over-week % of work orders meeting their effective ECD.
90%
+19.0pp
9 Mar16 Mar
Top miss reasons
Distribution across Not-Ready outcomes.
Parts delayed / backorder58 · 46%
Staffing capacity / backlog28 · 22%
Awaiting approval (customer/insurer)22 · 18%
Additional faults found11 · 9%
Vehicle test failed / rework required2 · 2%
Diagnostic ongoing2 · 2%
Dispute (scope / cost)2 · 2%
Garage league table
Rolling adherence across the closed-WO history.
| Garage | Closed | Adherence |
|---|---|---|
1Coventry Mercedes Authorised | 48 | 94% |
2Birmingham Commercial Repairs | 43 | 91% |
3Manchester Heavy Vehicle Centre | 40 | 90% |
4Glasgow Commercial MOT | 46 | 87% |
5Nottingham Volvo Truck Centre | 56 | 86% |
6Bristol Truck Solutions | 42 | 81% |
7London Crossrail Truck Hub | 60 | 80% |
8Cardiff HGV Services | 59 | 78% |
9Leeds DAF Specialists | 49 | 78% |
10Sheffield Vehicle Centre | 57 | 74% |
11Newcastle Fleet Workshop | 48 | 69% |
12Eastside Express Repairs | 53 | 51% |
Data computed live from Sentinel's audit trail · CSV export coming next iteration